EVE Search - An overdue apology and request for parley

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

An overdue apology and request for parley

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 19 post(s)
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.25 05:52:00 - [1] I finally un**ed my forum account just so I could post in this thread, and to condense all my thoughts down to a single sentence fragment, the past day has been eye opening. To say the least. I am not going to fall victim to hysteria. I will however not renew my subscription if there is no solid denial of sandbox-altering MT content within a reasonable timeframe, within about the next week or so. Everyone in this thread has raised reasonable concerns; no one in this thread is whining, and though there is a good bit of hysteria present in this thread I'd be a **ing moron if I said it was baseless. As many others have said, the silence from CCP so far has been deafening.
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.25 05:56:00 - [2] Originally by: Jaroslav Unwanted Originally by: Arvir Aris I finally un**ed my forum account just so I could post in this thread, and to condense all my thoughts down to a single sentence fragment, the past day has been eye opening. To say the least. I am not going to fall victim to hysteria. I will however not renew my subscription if there is no solid denial of sandbox-altering MT content within a reasonable timeframe, within about the next week or so. Everyone in this thread has raised reasonable concerns; no one in this thread is whining, and though there is a good bit of hysteria present in this thread I'd be a *ing moron if I said it was baseless. As many others have said, the silence from CCP so far has been deafening. You should try to read first few pages. There is an reply from CCP -forgot his name-* NO we wont implenet things in NEX which wil ** up the sandbox. Um. That seems to be bull**, since that's what most people in this thread are upset about. But thanks for playing.
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.25 06:11:00 - [3] Originally by: Jaroslav Unwanted Edited by: Jaroslav Unwanted on 25/06/2011 06:05:54 Originally by: CCP Manifest Originally by: Evelgrivion Edited by: Evelgrivion on 24/06/2011 00:36:49 Here's my big question that I demand an answer to. Are you going to ** the EVE Online sandbox over for Monetary Transactions or not? If not, all is forgiven. If MTs are going to impact the sandbox, start printing your resumes and god help you all. The designs we will implement in game will not ** over the sandbox. @players / Just so you know. All that "now laughable attempt of rage" is pointless. It just proves you are beyond help in your own imaginary world. Why do I get the sense that all this is just waaaay over your head? Did you not read the "Fearless" newsletter entitled "Greed is Good"? I think it was made pretty clear in that pdf that ruining the sandbox (with MT items and ships) is precisely what CCP has in mind. You're not going to earn any friends at CCP by having contempt for the legitimate concerns of other players, so please stop posting.
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.25 22:27:00 - [4] I find it extremely humorous that a pencil-pusher/number-cruncher from CCP's marketing and research division knows more about the game and community than the man responsible for the game's vision and direction, probably because he has (surprise!) actually played the game. This man is not a hero, but he is a brave man nonetheless. I hope he is not targeted by management for what he's already said.
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.25 22:45:00 - [5] Originally by: solar wave is it me or have they just lowerd the player cap in Jita from 1600 to 1500? There's no player cap, you just need to spend 500 Aurum to make the jump now.
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.25 22:48:00 - [6] Originally by: solar wave well it looks like you got CCP's answer to all of this shouting, they just lowerd the cap in jita another 100!!!! It's funny how they're able to ban folks on the forums and deploy techs to counter the riots yet they can't pull Hilmar away from his golf game long enough to get a coherent answer to the question that's on the collective mind.
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.25 23:14:00 - [7] Originally by: Kewso Holy ****, that rules.
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.26 06:56:00 - [8] Originally by: Pherick Sjang CCP's next revenue-earning attempt will be an EVE newsletter titled "Send us your $ and we'll send you back double!" Actually lol'd, nice work
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.26 23:22:00 - [9] Originally by: seeseelia Originally by: Miilla I cannot wait until the new kind of greifer pwns u into a tear bucket with their wallet buying Flying Golden Geese with 500% damage bonuses Meh. I won't be around if people can pay to win like that. Pay to win is NOT an inevitability. I am 100% against that. But paying for certain advantages that do NOT affect the economic balance of the EVE universe probably are. Wake up.
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.27 00:42:00 - [10] Welp, so much for this ****

Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.27 01:20:00 - [11] Quote: Due to the volatility of the topic we want to refrain from any further comments on this matter until after meeting with the CSM. Oh lord, he's afraid of saying anything lest he make it worse. I can't wait to hear the news they're just dying to tell us that will somehow make things worse.
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.27 05:11:00 - [12] IT'S SUPER EFFECTIVE! This is no longer a threadnought. This has passed the threshhold into armathreaddon.
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.27 17:56:00 - [13] Originally by: Askerius Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny Wait! We're still not done with this whole WMD in Iraq thing. I may have to point out what the difference is between a weapon of mass destruction and a mass casualty weapon. Are u truly believe in this? Iraq is just the matter of OIL! Non less! And government are hiding its intension's saying something stupid like "it's for the peace in the world" they do not have right to invade to Iraq!
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.27 18:24:00 - [14] Originally by: Askereus Sajuuk-Khar Where is some link to the original Hilmar's E-mail? That one where he told to not listen to us? evenews24.com
Arvir Aris	Posted - 2011.06.28 23:44:00 - [15] Originally by: Mia Aires You read this here: "J=n doesn't think people will quit eve due to these changes." Quote: It is just a rehearsal of the old tired arguments: we didn't mean it, it was just a discussion document, we're sorry. **** that. If you think that that is the case you can take your turn at the CCP funny farm. That wasn't a discussion document, that was an announcement with a safety disclaimer. They meant every damning word of it, and CCP is only sorry because it came out like it did. The only way to avoid it is to get rid of MT in EVE entirely. Anything else CCP simply can't be trusted with. It really is that clear cut right now ... I think this may have been the best quote in this entire sordid issue.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.